Abstract

The Asian financial crisis was a time of financial catastrophe that grasped quite a bit of East Asia starting in July 1997 and raised reasons for alarm of an overall economic emergency. This study investigates the effects of capital control and external debts during the 1997 financial crisis, and whether a country should impose capital control or opt for external debt to recuperate from the crisis. Utilizing system estimation approach, an econometric model is devised by employing panel data for Malaysia, Thailand, Indonesia, the Philippines and South Korea over the period from 1990 to 2000. Our findings suggest that on average the ASEAN economies choosing external debt perform better in achieving greater economic growth and rebounding compared to economies that imposed capital control.